Posted by Amazon Customer Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/themoneysit08-20
Bill Churchhill reviewed:
Poor Folk| 17 of 19 people found the following review helpful: this short novel (under 150 pp) a leading Russian literary critic at the time (Belinsky) prophesied that Dost. would become a famous literary star. He was certainly correct. _Poor Folk_ is written in the form of letters between a middle aged man and read. Add to that Dost. high literary skill and you have a real classic. There Here are a few quotes to whet your appetite: "How we wept together, he and I. We thought about you. He's a very nice "You and your sad thoughts make me so despondent, my dearest. I pray to "Yesterday I repented before the Lord God with tears in my eyes, begging |
| October 11, 2001 |
Posted by Amazon Customer Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/themoneysit08-20
ultraman reviewed:
Linksys PCMPC200 EtherFast 10/100 CardBus PC Card| 0 of 1 people found the following review helpful: Recommendation: Strong Buy |
| October 11, 2001 |
Posted by Amazon Customer Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/themoneysit08-20
ultraman reviewed:
RCA ANT1020 Universal Indoor Antenna
| 3 of 8 people found the following review helpful: Recommendation: Strong Buy |
| October 11, 2001 |
Posted by Amazon Customer Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/themoneysit08-20
Bill Churchhill reviewed:
The Friend of the Family: The Manor of Stepantchikovo| 12 of 13 people found the following review helpful: characters I've ever met in the world of literature. The interaction between the uncle of the narrator, Colonel Yegor Ilyitch Rostanev, and the "friend" of the family, Foma Fomitch Opiskin, is the center of the action in the novel. The narrator and a few other outsiders to the household of the uncle observe this interaction with disbelief and consternation. The uncle is a man of utmost goodness who always considers others better than himself and has been convinced by his evil mother and Foma that he is the worst egotist the world has ever known (though any sane person knows that is the greatest possible lie). This conviction greatly upsets the uncle and makes him even more selfless and not a little despairing. Foma is a petty egotist of the worse possible kind and utterly vain; he considers himself the most brilliant and special of all men, though the world has rarely known anyone so stupid and so utterly lacking in innate quality. His twisting of the uncle's good actions and words in his long monologues are terrible and sometimes almost difficult even to read, let alone that one could stomach them in real life. Eventually Foma assumes complete control of the uncle's household and reigns as a completely unreasonable tyrant. Then a number of surprising events occur, culminating in a most unexpected climax ... In short, a psychologically perceptive and exasperating (because of Foma) novel by the literary genius named Fyodor Dostoyevsky. Like all Dostoyevsky's novels, I find it difficult to pick out one theme or "moral"/point which is expressed in this novel, as his writings are usually too complex and true to life for that IMHO. |
| October 10, 2001 |
Posted by Amazon Customer Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/themoneysit08-20
Bill Churchhill reviewed:
The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings
| 19 of 21 people found the following review helpful: The Lord of the Rings is a literary epic and masterpiece which I deeply love. Indeed I must confess that at various points throughout and especially at the very end of The Lord of the Rings it has the power to move me to tears every time I reread it (which I've now done 4 times; for me that beats any other novel except Potok's The Chosen and The Promise but they're much shorter). Although the work never mentions God or Christ, is not about a world which exists and is not allegorical in any way (Tolkien himself strenuously maintained that), it is nevertheless a profoundly Christian novel. This is the case because of its high moral character shown in many ways and its true depiction of the pattern of the struggle between good and evil as this expresses itself in individuals and more widely in cities, nations and nature as well. Because of this, I find it is a truly wholesome experience to read it. In a very vivid way made possible only when writing about a fantasy world, Tolkien's book encourages one to fight sin and to delight in all things good, beautiful and worthy of praise because of the many concrete examples of this kind of activity in the novel. Though these considerations may be enough, the book is also very well-written in a simple though elegant (almost biblical) prose style. Tolkien is a master at describing journeys with incredible "accurate" detail in his geographical descriptions. He is also able to keep up the suspense over more than a 1000 pages, no mean feat. The incredible detail with which he describes his created world (with its imaginary beings, though there are also men like us) and the tremendous depth which he gives to the story by referring to a lot of history in passing makes one forget that it is fantasy. The wide scope of the story encompassing the involvement and the future of various nations and peoples and indeed of the survival of good itself on Middle-Earth makes The Lord of the Rings a true epic. To end with a simple remark: if you like action and adventure, you'll love this book. What I have written in the above two paragraphs is, needless to say, merely my own opinion, though a strong one. I say this especially with Tolkien since views on him are almost always very forceful. Either one loves his books or hates them. I have a few books with articles on Tolkien by literary critics. Some praise him to the skies and others find him to be rubbish. I truly cannot fathom how the later can be true. C.S. Lewis, a good friend and Oxford colleague of Tolkien, upon finishing The Lord of the Rings wrote Tolkien, "My dear Tollers, ... I have drained the rich cup and satisfied a long thirst. Once it really gets under weigh the steady upward slope of grandeur and terror (not unrelieved by green dells, without which it would indeed be intolerable) is almost unequalled in the whole range of narrative art known to me. In two virtues I think it excels: sheer sub-creation - Bombadil, Barrow Wights, Elves, Ents - as if from inexhaustible resources, and construction. Also in gravitas. No romance can repel the charge of `escapism' with such confidence. If it errs, it errs in precisely the opposite direction: all victories of hope deferred and the merciless piling up of odds against the heroes are near to being too painful. And the long coda after the eucatastrophe, whether you intended it or no, has the effect of reminding us that victory is as transitory as conflict, that (as Byron says) `there's no sterner moralist than pleasure', and so leaving a final impression of profound melancholy. ... I congratulate you. All the long years you have spent on it are justified." (From Humphrey Carpenter's J.R.R. Tolkien: A Biography). The Lord of the Rings is set at the end of the Third Age of Middle-Earth. For tales about the First and Second Age (referred to in songs and poems in The Lord of the Rings), read The Silmarillion. These three books are Tolkien's best. |
| October 10, 2001 |



